TwoMinuteWarning.com
TwoMinuteWarning.com TwoMinuteWarning.com TwoMinuteWarning.com TwoMinuteWarning.com



SEASON WIN
PICKS



Q: What kind of tips can you give about how to play the Season Win over/unders?

A: Thanks to our friends at Americasline.com, we were able to get our hands on the season win over/under lines from 1996 to 2000 and added in our live 2001 results. With all this data we were able to provide a more sophisticated look at this bet type in parts I, II and III. Now we'll put it all together and see what the historical trends would suggest for the 2002 teams:

  • Win History -- the historical over/under rates of a certain prior year win number (see Part I) compared to the season number set for the team
  • Line History -- the historical over/under rates of a certain line number (Part II)
  • Line minus Wins -- the historical over/under rates taking the Line minus prior year wins (Part II)
  • Bounce Effect -- the historical over/under rates of teams that had 3 more or fewer wins in the last season than the year before (Part III)
  • Draft Picks -- the historical over/under rates based on a team's number of first round picks (Part III)

Team
1999 Wins
2000 Wins
2001 Wins
2002 Early Line
Win History
Hist Over
Line History
Line minus Wins
Bounce Effect
Draft Picks
Consensus
St. Louis
13
10
14
11
UNDER
14%
.
Under
UNDER
.
Under
Pittsburgh
6
9
13
10.5
Over
60%
UNDER
Over
UNDER
.
.
Green Bay
8
9
12
10.5
UNDER
30%
UNDER
Under
UNDER
.
Under
San Francisco
4
6
12
10
UNDER
35%
.
Under
UNDER
.
Under
Philadelphia
5
11
11
10
Under
38%
.
Over
.
.
.
Miami
9
11
11
9.5
.
50%
Under
Under
.
Under
Under
Tampa Bay
11
10
9
9.5
Under
36%
Under
.
.
Under
Under
Oakland
8
12
10
9.5
Under
40%
Under
Under
.
.
Under
Denver
6
11
8
9.5
UNDER
27%
Under
.
Over
.
.
Indianapolis
13
10
6
9.5
UNDER
29%
Under
Over
Over
.
.
Seattle
9
6
9
9
Under
40%
Over
Under
.
.
.
Chicago
6
5
13
8.5
OVER
80%
.
Under
.
.
.
New England
8
5
11
8.5
OVER
68%
.
Over
.
.
Over
N.Y. Jets
8
9
10
8.5
.
56%
.
Under
.
.
.
Washington
10
8
8
8.5
.
47%
.
.
.
.
.
Tennessee
13
13
7
8.5
Under
36%
.
.
Over
.
.
Cleveland
2
3
7
8
.
42%
Under
Over
.
.
.
Atlanta
5
4
7
8
.
42%
Under
Over
.
.
.
Minnesota
10
11
5
8
UNDER
35%
Under
Over
Over
.
.
San Diego
8
1
5
7.5
Under
40%
.
.
OVER
.
.
Baltimore
8
12
10
7.5
OVER
72%
.
Over
.
.
Over
N.Y. Giants
7
12
7
7.5
.
50%
.
.
Over
.
.
Cincinnati
4
4
6
7
.
52%
.
Over
.
.
.
Dallas
8
5
5
7
.
42%
.
.
.
.
.
Jacksonville
14
7
6
7
.
52%
.
Over
.
.
.
Kansas City
9
7
6
7
.
52%
.
Over
.
.
.
Buffalo
11
8
3
7
UNDER
14%
.
Over
Over
.
.
New Orleans
3
10
7
7
.
54%
.
Under
Over
.
.
Arizona
6
3
7
6.5
.
58%
.
Under
OVER
.
.
Detroit
8
9
2
6
UNDER
33%
Over
Over
Over
.
.
Carolina
8
7
1
5.5
OVER
80%
Over
Over
Over
.
Over

ANALYSIS: All of the above is based on following historical patterns with regards to this bet, which is always a somewhat shaky starting point. This season though that warning is particularly true, given the restructuring of the NFL divisions -- some teams made out like bandits from this, while others may have been thrown to the lions!

However, we isolated those teams where there were at least two factors pointing the same way and no conflicting information. Whether this is the best approach is certainly arguable. In the interest of full disclosure therefore, we will mention our results from 2001 with a similar type of analysis:

  • Consensus Picks: 8-4
  • Win History: 12-8
  • Line History: 11-4
  • Line minus Wins: 11-6
  • Bounce Effect: 5-1
  • Draft Picks: 2-2

As the patterns revealed in our research have shown, the best plan has often been to go Under on select high win totals (eg the expected good teams) and go Over on select low totals (the expected bad teams). Part of this theory is that injuries can quickly take their toll on even the best squad (who are often facing much tougher schedules than their previous season) while the lowly teams have an easier schedule and can benefit by "things going wrong" from the teams above them.

One last note before we sign off on this for now is that the lines we are using are very preliminary and subject to change quite significantly as the NFL season draws closer. We'll revisit the above table once we get into August and the lines are firmer.

Update:
Yes, the lines have moved some from our original postings, although with season wins you have often to go to offshore and hence shakier lines which are also dominated by moving the money line instead of moving the actual # of games. Here's a quick rundown of some of the teams with line changes:

St. Louis -- now 11.5 most places. The increase in the line actually improves their chances of going over in the "line minus wins" column, but decreases it elsewhere, so the pick stays UNDER.

Seattle -- the line has been dropping thanks to Dilfer's injury and Walter Jones' holdout. Volatile at this point. The under becomes a little more favorable as the line drops, but not to the degree it becomes a pick.

Atlanta -- the number is now 7 or 7 1/2 most places. Starts to edge towards the under as teams with season lines the same as the prior year wins are 13/19 under.

Buffalo -- now 6 1/2 at several places. Still a strong under on 'win history' but with conflicting over evidence on 'line minus wins' and 'bounce.'

Carolina -- ugh! Line hasn't moved much most places but difficult to make an over play on a team that dumps the presumed starting QB for an aging, aged veteran. Is Rodney Peete the best option? Even Jeff George would seem like a step up!

Copyright © 2002 by TwoMinuteWarning.com, All Right Reserved

Return to Subscriber Home Page
Return to TMW Home Page